Skip to content
narrow screen wide screen auto screen Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size blue color orange color green color

Family Tree Mediation




Thursday, 12 April 2012 13:21

Working Separately with Different Aspects of Our Experience of Conflict

What happens in mediation can be hard to describe. A word of acknowledgment, an admission of pain, an uncovered fact can cause an internal shift within one or all of the participants that completely reorients the dynamics between individuals in a positive way. The internal aspects of our experience of dispute are indeed wondrous when an opening occurs that helps the parties to find agreement and even healing. But the opposite is also true: the internal aspects of our experience of dispute are also cause for frustration and dysfunction when we are unable to navigate our disputes effectively because we don’t have a good enough handle on what’s going on inside ourselves.

Yes, our conflicts are not just about the material goods, the outward aspects of the dispute at issue. Our conflicts inevitably are also very much about (1) the inward perceptions of the participants, (2) the way the inward emotional landscape of each participant effects his or her perceptions, and (3) the deeper inward needs that are emotionally linked to the outward material goods at issue.

A principal value of mediation is that the mediator offers the opportunity to isolate and focus upon different aspects of each party’s perceptions and experience so that it can be dealt with effectively on its own terms. Each mediation is different and the elements of the dispute that need to be isolated and dealt with separately are different in each case. However, Sharon Strand Ellison provides an illuminating insight into how useful this process of separating out different aspects of our inward perceptions and experience can be in her book, Taking the War Out of Words.

Ellison writes: “When we focus on the other person’s power over us, we are usually not focused on our own strength, or even on the other’s vulnerability.” (p. 12)

This simple insight speaks volumes. In disputes, it is all too common to concentrate enormous amounts of energy on defensive strategies aimed at protecting ourselves against the power we perceive the other to control. The reflex implies that if the other has power, he or she cannot be vulnerable and we cannot have power of our own, especially power to do anything but defend ourselves.

Mediation provides the opportunity to hold our adversary’s power and vulnerability and our own power and vulnerability each as a separate issue, making room for a course of action that does not involve conflict, but agreement.

Our adversary’s vulnerability does not have to be relative to our power. Our power does not have to be relative to the power of our adversary. By asking participants to look behind their positions at their deeper needs and interests, mediation invites them to recognize their power to defend and meet their needs while also respecting and seeking to meet the needs of their “adversary.” When we are able to untangle the vulnerability and power each person possesses from that of the other, individuals who were previously “adversaries” can readily become partners with respect to charting a mutually agreed upon course for the future.

In fact, we don't even need a major dispute or the help of a mediator to explore this opportunity. Next time you feel threatened, try for a moment to put the threat aside and remind yourself of all the strengths you have apart from the context of the threat. Treat the threat as a puzzle and see if you can find his or her vulnerability hiding in plain sight. Just this little effort can give you time to get calm and meet the threat with enough room in your perspective to invite your antagonist into a more productive dialogue.

Read 43012 times

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Latest Blog Posts

  • Communication Skills Roundup: The Difficult Conversation Anatomy
    Communication Skills Roundup: The Difficult Conversation Anatomy One of the influences that led me to become an attorney mediator focusing on helping families navigate conflicts, challenges, change and opportunity is the incredibly useful book, Difficult Conversations, written by the directors of the Harvard Negotiation Project.  This book is the product of thousands of hours of discussions with…
  • The What Happened Conversation, Part 2
    The What Happened Conversation, Part 2 In “The What Happened Conversation, Part 1,” I suggested that our lack of experience skillfully navigating difficult conversations all too often leads us to conclude that we are damned if we do (pardon my French), and damned if we don’t.  For this reason we are prone to adopt a strategy…
  • The What Happened Conversation, Part 1
    The What Happened Conversation, Part 1 They are all too common, those difficult conversations we would do almost anything to avoid.  And though we do try our best to avoid them, that never seems to work.  Sooner or later, we get cornered by a situation grown intolerable for at least one of the parties in the…
  • The Feelings Conversation, Part 2
    The Feelings Conversation, Part 2 Last time, I talked about all the ways sharing feelings feels unsafe and why it’s actually more risky to keep feelings out of a difficult conversation than it is to put them in it.  I also explained that this “feelings layer” of the conversation was only part of the anatomy…
  • The Feelings Conversation, Part 1
    The Feelings Conversation, Part 1 We all know what it’s like to NOT want to share our feelings.  We know the vulnerability, imbalance, unpredictability, and wild nature the feelings by themselves often embody.  We know their subjectivity, and the ease with which they may be ridiculed and judged.  We know how challenging they make maintaining…

facebook twitterlinkedin icon 32px pinterestlinkedin